MAPPING GENDER-RELATED PROVISIONS IN INDONESIA'S FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS

Main Article Content

Nurul Aulia
Yulia Rimapradesi
Muhammad Aditya Purnomo
Larassita Damayanti

Abstract

International trade is increasingly recognized as a policy arena that is not gender-neutral.  However, systematic mapping of gender mainstreaming across Indonesia’s trade agreement portfolio remains limited. This study maps the presence and design of gender-related provisions in 19 Indonesian international trade agreements concluded up to 2025. It applies a gender-related provisions framework and assesses five agreements containing explicit provisions using the International Trade Centre instrument across ten dimensions. The study combines document-based content analysis, corpus analysis using AntConc, manual verification, and a staged scoring procedure with triangulation to reach consensus scores. The findings indicate that 14 agreements (74%) are gender-blind, while five agreements (26%) contain explicit gender-related provisions. The Indonesia–Canada CEPA (2025) achieves an Advanced Gender Responsiveness score (85%), while the remaining agreements fall into the Evolving (42.5% and 35%) and Limited (32.5% and 20%) categories. The frequency dimension is most commonly met, whereas the dispute settlement dimension is most frequently absent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

References

Amaral, R. V., & Jaller, L. S. D. (2023). Mainstreaming Gender in Investment Treaties and Its Prevailing Trends. In A. Bahri, D. López, & J. Remy (Eds.), Trade Policy and Gender Equality (pp. 194–212). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363716.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363716.012

Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357

Bahri, A. (2019). Measuring the Gender-Responsiveness of Free Trade Agreements: Using a Self-Evaluation Maturity Framework. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 14(11/12), 517–527. http://www.cutsgeneva.org/pdf/STUDY%20%20Gender%20and%20Trade.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/GTCJ2019064

Bahri, A. (2023). Gender Mainstreaming in Trade Agreements: Best Practice Examples and Challenges in the Asia-Pacific. In A. Bahri, D. Lopez, & J. Remy (Eds.), Trade Policy and Gender Equality (pp. 292–310). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363716.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363716.017

Bahri, A. (2025). The Pentagon Roadmap for Trade and Gender Negotiations. In Trade Agreements and Women (pp. 198–238). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198935759.003.0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198935759.003.0010

Bahri, A., & Amaral, R. (2024). Gender Equality Provisions in Trade and Investment Agreements: Are They Widening the Negotiation Capacity Gap? World Trade Review, 23(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745623000368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745623000368

Bakardzhieva, D., & Chehab, S. (2025). Promoting Women’s Economic Empowerment Through Economic Diplomacy: The Case of the Arab Gulf’s Free Trade Agreements. Economies, 13(10), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100290

Bedford, K., & Rai, S. M. (2010). Feminists theorize international political economy. Signs, 36(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/652910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/652910

Brodsky, A., Lim, J., & Reinsch, W. (2021). Role of Gender in Trade Agreements. In Women and Trade (How Trade Agreements Can Level the Gender Playing Field). Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep53715.7

Bustamante, J. C., & Navia, F. M. (2023). South America’s Leadership in Gender Mainstreaming in Trade Agreements. In A. Bahri, D. Lopez, & J. Ramy (Eds.), Trade Policy and Gender Equality (pp. 267–291). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363716.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363716.016

Chi, M. (2024). Article: Trade-Gender Alignment of International Trade Agreements: Insufficiencies and Improvements. Journal of World Trade, 58(Issue 5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2024040

Chi, M., & Yin, Z. (2024). Trade-Gender Alignment of International Trade Agreements: Insufficiencies and Improvements. Journal of World Trade, 58(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2024040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2024040

Davies, S. G. (n.d.). Women in politics in Indonesia in the decade post-Beijing n.

der Boghossian, A., Bahri, A., & Laperle-Forget, L. (2025). Gender Equality in Trade Agreements. In The Concept Design of a Twenty-First Century Preferential Trade Agreement (pp. 340–364). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009484640.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009484640.016

Direktorat Jenderal Perundingan Perdagangan Internasional, K. P. R. (2025). Free Trade Agreement. https://ftacenter.kemendag.go.id/free-trade-agreement

Dommen, C. (2021). Mainstreaming Gender in Trade Policy: Practice, evidence, and ways forward. www.iisd.org

Elias, J., & Roberts, A. (2018). Introduction: Situating Gender Scholarship in IPE. In J. Elias & A. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook on the International Political Economy of Gender. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478842.00005

Elias, Juanita., & Rethel, Lena. (2016). The everyday political economy of Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316402092

Faggiano, M. P. (2022). Introduction: Interrogating Textual Material in Today’s Day and Age. In Content Analysis in Social Research (pp. 1–6). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004537835_002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004537835_002

Frohmann, A. (2017). Gender Equality and Trade Policy (24/2017). https://www.wti.org/media/filer_public/8b/a8/8ba88d03-1a2b-4311-af6a-629d9997c54c/working_paper_no_24_2017_frohmann.pdf

Goist, M., & Monroe, B. L. (2020). Taking Data Seriously in the Design of Data Science Projects. In L. Curini & R. Franzese (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and IR (pp. 79–103). Sage Publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387.n8

Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028

Hanifah, S. F., Azhar, H., Aulia, N., & Rivai, F. (2021). Komitmen Indonesia dalam Liberalisasi Jasa Telekomunikasi: GATS, AFAS, dan ASEAN+. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 5(2), 312–333. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v5n2.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v5n2.8

Hannah, E., Roberts, A., & Trommer, S. (2021). Towards a feminist global trade politics. Globalizations, 18(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1779966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1779966

Hannah, E., Roberts, A., & Trommer, S. (2022). Canada’s “Feminist” Trade Policy? In D. Carment, L. Macdonald, & J. Paltiel (Eds.), Canada and Great Power Competition: Canada Among Nations 2021 (pp. 71–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04368-0_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04368-0_4

International Trade Centre. (2020). Mainstreaming Gender in Free Trade Agreements (SIVC-20-31.E).

Karam, F., & Zaki, C. (2024). When Trade Agreements Are Gender-Friendly: Impact on Women Empowerment Using Firm Data. Journal of Economic Integration, 39(4), 875–898. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024036

Kementerian PPN/BAPPENAS. (2020). Pedoman Teknis Penyusunan Rencana Aksi - Edisi Ii Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan/Sustainable Development Goals (TPB/SDGs). Kedeputian Bidang Kemaritiman dan Sumber Daya Alam, Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. https://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id/e-library/file_upload/koleksi/dokumenbappenas/konten/Upload%20Terbaru/Buku-Pedoman-Rencana-Aksi-SDGs%20(1).pdf

Kis-Katos, K., Pieters, J., & Sparrow, R. (2018). Gender, labour markets and trade liberalisation in Indonesia. In A. A. Patunru, M. Pangestu, & M. C. Basri (Eds.), Globalisation, Nationalism and Sovereignty (pp. 157–179). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/doi:10.1355/9789814818230-014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814818230-014

Korinek, J., Moïsé, E., & Tange, J. (2021). Trade and Gender a Framework of Analysis Oecd Trade and Agriculture Directorate Trade and Gender: A Framework of Analysis.

Kuhlmann, K., & Bahri, A. (2023). Gender Mainstreaming in Trade Agreements: “A Potemkin Façade”? Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2511https://ssrn.com/abstract=4452694

Kusumawardhana, I., & Abbas, R. J. (2018). Indonesia di Persimpangan: Urgensi “Undang-Undang Kesetaraan dan Keadilan Gender” di Indonesia Pasca Deklarasi Bersama Buenos Aires Pada Tahun 2017. Jurnal HAM, 9(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2018.9.153-174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2018.9.153-174

MacDonald, L. C. (2024). Inclusion of gender and labour standards in preferential trade agreements: evidence from North American and Canada-Chile agreements. Globalizations, 21(8), 1421–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2356354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2356354

Mengesha, E. (2008). Rethinking the rules and principles of the international trade regime: Feminist perspectives. Agenda, 22(78), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2008.9674979

Minister for Trade and Tourism, A. (2022, November 13). Australia strengthens trade agreement with ASEAN and New Zealand. https://www.trademinister.gov.au/minister/don-farrell/media-release/australia-strengthens-trade-agreement-asean-and-new-zealand?_gl=1*un42vw*_ga*NTY3MjQxMTc4LjE3NDc4ODI2NTY.*_ga_8Z18QMQG8V*czE3NzAxNzA3MzIkbzgkZzAkdDE3NzAxNzA3MzIkajYwJGwwJGgw

Monteiro, J.-A. (2018). Gender-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements.

Monteiro, J.-A. (2021). The Evolution of Gender-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: 2021/08 (WTO Working Papers). https://doi.org/10.30875/dd10a280-en

Musfiroh. (2024). Indonesia’s Motivations for Signing of the Indonesia-Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IC-CEPA). Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 4(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v4i1.3132

Nurdin, N. (2024). Analisis Pengarusutamaan Gender di Indonesia, 2000-2023: Pendekatan Institusionalisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 5(2), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i2.2650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i2.2650

Pashakhanlou, A. H. (2017). Fully integrated content analysis in International Relations. International Relations, 31(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817723060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817723060

Prajuli, W. A., Yustikaningrum, R. V., & Amurwanti, D. N. (2021). How gender socialization is improving women’s representation in Indonesia’s Foreign affairs: breaking the ceiling. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(5), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1893653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1893653

Saraswati, L. A. (2017). The Gender Politics of Human Waste and Human-as-Waste: Indonesian Migrant Workers and Elderly Care in Japan. Gender, Work and Organization, 24(6), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12183

Suwandi, I. (2022). Rantai Nilai: Wajah Baru Imperialisme Ekonomi. Penerbit Independen.

True, J. (2015, April 20). Why we need a feminist foreign policy to stop war. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/why-we-need-feminist-foreign-policy-to-stop-war/

UN Women. (2018). Why Gender Equality Matters Across All SDGs. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2018/SDG-report-Chapter-3-Why-gender-equality-matters-across-all-SDGs-2018-en.pdf

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Trade and Entrepreneurship in Indonesia From a Gender and Development Perspective. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213585825

Viju-Miljusevic, C., & Weinar, A. (2024). Gender in the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement: Third-Generation Trade Agreement as a Gateway to Policy Coordination? Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies, 17(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.22215/cjers.v17i1.4490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/cjers.v17i1.4490

Winanti, P. S. (2022). Menakar Kesiapan Indonesia dalam Merespons Perjanjian Perdagangan Internasional. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.23-40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.23-40

World Bank, & World Trade Organization. (2020). Women and Trade: The Role of Trade in Promoting Gender Equality. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1016/978-1-4648-1541-6

WTO. (2017). Buenos Aires Declaration on Trade and Women’s Economic Empowerment. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/womenandtrade_e/buenos_aires_declaration_e.htm

Most read articles by the same author(s)