Does the Single Draft of COC in the South China Sea Matters?
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Tulisan ini bermaksud untuk mengelaborasi bagaimana dampak Draf Tunggal CoC dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa Laut Cina Selatan (LCS). Tulisan ini menggunakan konsep International Dispute Settlement Procedures (IDSPs) di mana para pihak berusaha untuk menyelesaikan persoalan berdasarkan hukum internasional. Tulisan ini memiliki argumen bahwa negara-negara di kawasan telah berupaya untuk memiliki mekanisme tata berperilaku sejak tahun 1990-an. Meskipun tahun 2018 negara-negara ASEAN dan Cina telah menyepakati Draf Tunggal CoC mengenai tata berperilaku di LCS, penyelesaian sengketa LCS masih jauh dari kata selesai. Draf Tunggal CoC hanya merupakan kumpulan usulan ASEAN dan Cina. Kelemahan-kelemahan Draf Tunggal terdiri dari kelemahan dari sisi legal status yang tidak menyebutkan secara jelas kewajiban negara-negara anggota dan cenderung tidak ketat karena tiap negara bisa menambah atau menarik usulan masing-masing.
Rincian Artikel
Terbitan
Bagian
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Para penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel akan diberikan kepada Intermestik: Jurnal Studi Internasional, Departemen Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Padjadjaran sebagai penerbit jurnal.
Referensi
CSIS (2018) Defusing the South China Sea Disputes A Regional Blueprint. Washington DC: CSIS.
Dancel, R. (2017) ‘Asean, China adopt framework of code of conduct for South China Sea , SE Asia News & Top Stories - The Straits Times’, 6 August. Retrieved from: https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/chinas-foreign-minister-says-maritime-code-negotiations-with-asean-to-start-this-year (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Darmawan, A. B. and Mahendra, Lady (2018) ‘Isu Laut Tiongkok Selatan: Negara-negara ASEAN Terbelah Menghadapi Tiongkok’, Jurnal Global & Strategis, 12(1), p. 79. doi: 10.20473/jgs.12.1.2018.79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.12.1.2018.79-100
Jacques, M. (2011) When China Rules The World (Ketika China Menguasai Dunia): Kebangkitan Dunia Timur dan Akhir Dunia Barat. Edited by N. Cholis and J.Sumarwoto. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Johnson, A. N. (2012) A Bilateral Analysis of the South China Sea Dispute: China, the Philippines, and the Scarborough Shoal Recommended Citation. Florida International University. doi: 10.25148/etd.FI12071113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI12071113
Natalegawa, M. (2013) An Indonesian perspective on the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved from: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/05/20/an-indonesian-perspective-indo-pacific.html (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Pattiradjawane, R. (2016) ‘Arbitrase Laut Selatan: Ancaman Militerisasi Regional’, Kompas, 11 July.
Simon, S. W. (2012) ‘Conflict and diplomacy in the South China sea the view from washington’, Asian Survey. University of California Press, 52(6), pp. 995–1018. doi: 10.1525/as.2012.52.6.995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2012.52.6.995
Thayer. Carl (2018) ASEAN and China Set to Agree on Single Draft South China Sea Code of Conduct – The Diplomat. Retrieved from: https://thediplomat.com/2018/07/asean-and-china-set-to-agree-on-single-draft-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct/ (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Thayer, C. A. (2011) ‘Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea and Southeast Asian Responses’, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 2(30), pp. 77–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000205
Thayer, C. A. (2012) ‘ASEAN’S Code of Conduct in the South China Sea: A Litmus Test for Community-Building?’, The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus, 10(34). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1557466012032998
Thayer, C. A. (2013) ‘South China Sea in Regional Politics: Indonesia’s Efforts to Forge ASEAN Unity on a Code of Conduct’, in 3rd Annual Center for Strategic & International Studies Conference on “Managing Tensions in the South China Sea,” . Washington DC: CSIS. Retrieved from: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/attachments/130606_Thayer_ConferencePaper.pdf (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Thies, C. G. (2002) ‘A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations’, International Studies Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 3(4), pp. 351–372. doi: 10.2307/44218229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.t01-1-00099
Thuy, T. (2011) Recent Developments in the South China Sea: Implications for Regional Security and Cooperation. Retrieved from: www.aseansec.org/1196.htm (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Valencia, M. J. (2013) ‘What the “Zero Draft” Code of Conduct for the South China Sea Says (and Doesn’t Say) ’, Global Asia, 8(13). Retrieved from: https://www.globalasia.org/v8no1/feature/what-the-zero-draft-code-of-conduct-for-the-south-china-sea-says-and-doesnt-say_mark-j-valencia (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Xinhua (2017) ‘Maritime trade through South China Sea booms despite territory disputes - Xinhua | English.news.cn’, 5 August. Retrieved from: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-08/05/c_136502038.htm (Accessed: 29 May 2020).
Zangl, B. et al. (2011) ‘Between law and politics: Explaining international dispute settlement behavior’, European Journal of International Relations. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England, 18(2), pp. 369–401. doi:10.1177/1354066110389832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110389832